Welcome at RacingNews365

You are logged in. Benefit directly from all the benefits of your account:

  • Share your thoughts and opinions about F1
  • Win fantastic prizes
  • Get access to our premium content
  • Take advantage of more exclusive benefits

Welcome at RacingNews365

Become part of the largest racing community in the United Kingdom. Create your free account now!

  • Share your thoughts and opinions about F1
  • Win fantastic prizes
  • Get access to our premium content
  • Take advantage of more exclusive benefits
Sign in
Ferrari

Why it wasn't just strategy blunders that cost Ferrari in Hungary

Much attention has been drawn to the role of Ferrari's strategical errors in their loss of the Hungarian Grand Prix. However, as RacingNews365.com technical analyst Paolo Filisetti explains, this may not be the only area where things went wrong for the Scuderia.

Leclerc Russell Hungary
Analysis
To news overview © XPBimages

On the Sunday afternoon of the Hungarian Grand Prix, it was abundantly clear that Ferrari missed the mark by sending Charles Leclerc off on Hard tyres at his second pit-stop. It cost him an awful lot of time, time he was unable to make up.

On the other hand, it is also important to consider whether Mattia Binotto's statements after the race make sense, if only in part. He said that the car was not working properly and that the whole spectrum of tyres were not functioning well on the F1-75.

Looking at the first two stints of the race, the car was apparently competitive. We say 'apparently' because to really judge it we have to look at the speed of the competitors at the same time. When we look at the moment Charles Leclerc overtook George Russell and how that manoeuvre was achieved, some doubts start to creep in.

Bearing in mind Ferrari's speed during the long runs in the second free practice session on Friday, Leclerc should have been able to overtake Russell more easily, within no more than two laps. However, the set-up did not work as well in the cooler conditions as it did in warmer conditions.

The higher air density, coupled with a ride height that was too low (for that higher air pressure) caused a loss of downforce. It will not have been huge, but it will have been distributed evenly between the front and rear of the car.

Loss was masked by circumstances

So the balance of the car as such had not changed very much, but it had in terms of traction and drag. This is partly reflected in less top speed, while the colder conditions partly disguise the lack of traction.

Colder tarmac means less grip, so traction out of corners was already a bit less for everyone. In other words, all signs that Ferrari's set-up was just imperfect were so minimal that they only became apparent after a significant number of laps.

This may explain why the Ferrari mechanics didn't pick up on those signals quickly enough, as the reduced performance could logically be attributed to the lower temperatures, rather than the wrong set-up.

They probably only found this out in the very last stint, when they called on the Soft tyres, without any effect other than a handful of faster laps. So strategy was largely to blame, but the set-up was also far from perfect given the conditions.

Also interesting:

F1 Podcast: Did Ferrari snatch defeat from the jaws of victory once again?

RacingNews365.com F1 journalists Dieter Rencken and Michael Butterworth discuss the key topics from the Hungarian Grand Prix, including Ferrari's botched tyre strategy for Charles Leclerc.

F1 2022 Hungarian Grand Prix RN365 News dossier

0 comments

x