Max Verstappen has described McLaren's 'papaya rules' as "nonsense", with the Dutchman having criticised the Woking-based outfit's attempt at implementing team orders. McLaren introduced papaya rules mid-season, in an attempt to stop Lando Norris and Oscar Piastri from battling aggressively. It failed quickly, in particular at the Italian Grand Prix where an opening lap overtake for the lead on Norris by Piastri, ultimately resulted in Charles Leclerc winning the race. What made McLaren's code words unusual, is that it confused many, including Verstappen, by what it actually meant. "This is another nonsense quote," Verstappen told Viaplay . "What is that referring to? Papaya rules... I have no use for that at all. "When I'm told that by my engineer, I immediately say, 'Just shut up.' What is that supposed to mean? " ' You're allowed to race ' . They should have solved all that much easier and better as a team."
McLaren mistakes
Verstappen often had to battle a McLaren driver, usually Lando Norris, on his way to a fourth consecutive F1 drivers' title. Across the season, it was McLaren who had the strongest car, leading it to a first constructors' championship since 1998. However, Piastri and Norris both failed to defeat Verstappen in the drivers' title fight, through a combination of driver and team errors. The reigning world champion recognises McLaren had an excellent car this year, although believes much is still to be learnt by the outfit. "They had a very good car this year," added Verstappen. "Only I think it's also clear that they still had a lot to learn to compete consistently. "Of course, they did well in the constructors' championship. But for the drivers' championship they could have prepared it much better as well." Had the team and its drivers performed more consistently, Verstappen is confident Norris would have won the drivers' title. "Yes, that too," Verstappen concluded.
Most read
